Header Ziff Davis Enterprise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Wednesday, June 21, 2006 4:13 PM/EST

Advertisers to Google: What Have You Done for Me Lately?

Google to advertisers: Try our new cost-per-action advertising program.

Google is currently testing a new advertising program that pays site owners based on demonstrable post-click actions.

The program, called Cost-Per-Action, was revealed via an invitation e-mail from the Google AdSense team to Web site owners.

"The Google AdSense team would like to invite you to test a feature that provides you with a new way to earn revenue from your Web site by hosting ads that are compensated based on a Cost-Per-Action (CPA) basis," read the e-mail.

"These ads are very different in that you will be able to choose amongst a selection and you will also have more flexibility in promoting them."

Google representatives were not immediately available for comment.

The CPA ads differ from AdSense ads in that a site owner gets paid whenever a visitor clicks on an ad and performs a specific action, such as purchasing a product from the advertiser.

An AdSense text ad, on the other hand, generates revenue for the site owner if a user simply clicks on the ad.

The CPA ads are not designed to compete with AdSense ads, said the e-mail, as they will display across a "Content Referral" network that is separate from the AdSense network. Google also said the CPA ads would appeal to a different type of user.

"This is really about increasing accountability and measurability of Internet advertising," said Rob Sanderson, analyst at American Technology Research, which has locations in Greenwich, Conn., Denver and San Francisco.

Google's CPA model may provide an advertising system that companies that are not using AdSense -- or that have been the victims of click fraud in the past -- will be more comfortable with.

"In the aggregate, Google's advertising model is a self-healing model because it's auction-based," Sanderson said. "Now, they may be trying to offer remedies to those they feel have been the targets of click fraud or who have been left out of the system, fairly or unfairly."

David Jackson, writing on Seeking Alpha, said he thought this was Google's ValueClick killer, referring to the affiliate marketing company.

"Google has greater resources than ValueClick, a larger advertiser base, and the advantage of being able to offer publishers a full range of ads based on page views (CPM); clicks (CPC); and now actual purchases or leads (CPA)," Jackson wrote.

"Google can translate the performance of all these ads into 'effective CPMs,' allowing publishers to compare and optimize for whichever type of ad produces maximum revenue."

Google is testing this program amid growing concerns about click fraud, a process wherein advertisers are forced to pay for spurious clicks on their ads.

Google recently settled a $90 million click fraud case.

Create, Communicate, Collaborate with IT Professionals at Ziff Davis Enterprise IT Link

TrackBack

TrackBack

http://googlewatch.eweek.com/cgi-bin/mte/mt-tb.cgi/9460

Comments (7)

Nathan McKelvey :

If Google intends to keep it's content network model which uses third party sites who share in ad revenue, they will have to come up with a way to make the system more transparent to the advertisers. In this model, both Google and the third party Web site owners have a clear financial incentive to commit and hide click fraud. With anonymous Web access and sophisticated click bots, the cost-per-click system will never be able to accurately prevent click fraud.

Michiel Ybema :

The CPA system seems an obvious improvement. I've read the half a dozen readily available ponline comments but cannot figure out how Google prevents fraud with the CPA system: can't an advertiser 'hide' the action from Google? I am not a techie but imagine Google leaves a cookie on the user's PC when they click, the cookie changes in value when the user performs the action and Google checks the cookie value at regular intervals to verify whether the action has occurred...

Google Watch :

Advertisers wasted over $800 million last year on phony clicks, prompting many to blame Google and Yahoo for extensive fraud, according to a report released today.

Google Watch :

Advertisers wasted over $800 million last year on phony clicks, prompting many to blame Google and Yahoo for extensive fraud, according to a report released today.

Google Watch :

A Silicon Valley startup run by former AltaVista CEO Jim Barnett is betting its cost-per-action advertising system can outperform Google's pay-per-click method.

Google Watch :

A Silicon Valley startup run by former AltaVista CEO Jim Barnett is betting its cost-per-action advertising system can outperform Google's pay-per-click method.

Google Watch :

A Silicon Valley startup run by former AltaVista CEO Jim Barnett is betting its cost-per-action advertising system can outperform Google's pay-per-click method.

Post a Comment

 
 




Most Recent Blogs

Advertisement
Advertisement