Google Puts Up its Click Fraud Dukes
Google went on the offensive today against critics who argue that Google's advertising system is inherently vulnerable to fraudulent clicks. Those critics argue click fraud can account for 15-30% of all clicks on advertisements. But representatives from the search giant say reports released by third-parties are flawed because they count clicks never made on Google's AdWords system. Google says clicks may appear to be fraudulent even though they are not. For example, some Web users may navigate into a particular web site then back up with the browser's back button, reload the page, or open up an entirely new window. Google also criticized reports for using small sample sizes in their testing, and criticized third-party firms for hyping those test results in order to portray click fraud as a bigger problem than it is. The "he said, she said" argument can frustrate observers, who are stymied by Google's reticence to release their click fraud-estimation methodology. "We’re reluctant to share more about our technology and methods," said Shuman Ghosemajumder, Google's business product manager for trust & safety in a blog post, "because doing so would make it easier for fraudsters to try to defeat our systems. |

Comments (13)
Google's detection technology for invalid clicks is largely flawed.
Posted by A user | August 8, 2006 5:48 PM
What is "fraudelent"? Never heard of the word, but you used it twice, so it MUST be a word, right?
Posted by Jim | August 8, 2006 6:02 PM
My effort to create a brand new language (largely to describe my inscrutable hairstyle) continues apace.
Posted by Steve Bryant | August 8, 2006 7:55 PM
google can say whatever they want to, we know that the experts evaluate click fraud around 30%. Plus google didn't really care about click fraud up until July 2006. This means that they have been charging people for all the fraudulent clicks for more than 7 years. So I can honesly say that I do not trust google at all nor their so called estimates.
Posted by Cynthia | August 8, 2006 9:17 PM
Well, clearly the studies that indicate large-scale fraud haven't deterred advertisers from doing business with Google. There still must be an advantage to advertising by pay-per-click, otherwise I doubt Google would still be in business after all of these years.
Posted by Zach | August 9, 2006 3:24 PM
Google, fresh from its $90 million settlement, is being sued for click fraud again in a class action lawsuit filed in Pennsylvania federal district court.
Posted by Google Watch | August 17, 2006 3:06 PM
Google, fresh from its $90 million settlement, is being sued for click fraud again in a class action lawsuit filed in Pennsylvania federal district court.
Posted by Google Watch | August 17, 2006 3:09 PM
Google, fresh from its $90 million settlement, is being sued for click fraud again in a class action lawsuit filed in Pennsylvania federal district court.
Posted by Google Watch | August 17, 2006 3:11 PM
Google, fresh from its $90 million settlement, is being sued for click fraud again in a class action lawsuit filed in Pennsylvania federal district court.
Posted by Google Watch | August 17, 2006 3:20 PM
Google, fresh from its $90 million settlement, is being sued for click fraud again in a class action lawsuit filed in Pennsylvania federal district court.
Posted by Google Watch | August 17, 2006 3:41 PM
Google, fresh from its $90 million settlement, is being sued for click fraud again in a class action lawsuit filed in Pennsylvania federal district court.
Posted by Google Watch | August 17, 2006 4:47 PM
Google, fresh from its $90 million settlement, is being sued for click fraud again in a class action lawsuit filed in Pennsylvania federal district court.
Posted by Google Watch | August 17, 2006 4:57 PM
Google, fresh from its $90 million settlement, is being sued for click fraud again in a class action lawsuit filed in Pennsylvania federal district court.
Posted by Google Watch | August 18, 2006 1:28 AM