Header Ziff Davis Enterprise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Thursday, April 13, 2006 3:07 PM/EST

Merrill Lynch Analyst Sees a Google Search Conflict of Interest

A financial analyst is questioning whether Google is using its features to promote its content and services, and in a way that conflicts with its advertisers' interests.

For example, Merrill Lynch analyst Justin Post writes of discovering how a link to Google Finance, Google's new financial information site, is the top paid advertising link returned after searching for the term "finance."

Companies vie for that top slot because it's very valuable advertising real estate. The fact that the spotlight was once on a Google ad raises suspicions about foul play of some kind, regardless of how hard Google explains the trustworthiness of its advertising feature.

Post also wrote, in a less convincing argument, of how a search on www.google.com for "used Porsche" returns a "refine your search" box at the top of the results. It's actually a conduit to Google Base, Google's classifieds listings service.

Google benefits because the box Post describes occupies a very prominent portion of Google's search results page.

"Google has a conflict of interest between promoting Google content and providing the most relevant and unbiased results for users and advertisers," Post wrote. "Google could be construed in our opinion as [being] unfair to advertisers."

Post notes that there is only the potential for a rift between Google and advertisers. He's unaware of what he calls "any negative feedback." Also, Google's use of its own features to promote itself so far has been minimal.

When asked for comment, a Google representative wrote in an e-mail that "Google's search results are objective and not influenced in favor of our services or anyone else."

While for now just a tidbit worth squirreling away for future reference, it's quite a question Google will one day have to face.

TrackBack

TrackBack

http://googlewatch.eweek.com/cgi-bin/mte/mt-tb.cgi/9582

Comments (10)

Koops :

Is google-base not the feature that refines the search for purchasable materials? I do not see a conflict of interest, in fact, I see just confluence of interest for both google and users who both want to find the best result within the parameters given. Ditto for Google finance. I only see more specified, refined if you will, subcategories of google, that google is making users aware of.

Good2Great :

I am not sure if Google is right, interms of the rankings that are given for a search word? But as long as the link that is given meets the objecive of the searcher, i guess, Google still provided the stated services of connecting people with the information that they are searching for. G2G

Paul :

If the search result is accurate, it is right. Has Ben Charny written anything that was not anti-Google this year? This is getting boring, Ben. We all know it gets people to actually look at your blog, but it certainly is not for the commentary, it just happens to be the most popular name in tech to read about. Maybe you could try a different angle and see if you can find just one thing they did right this year?

Google Watch :

A Google promo shows up, and a conflict-of-interest theory gets a little stronger.

Google Watch :

A Google promo shows up, and a conflict-of-interest theory gets a little stronger.

Google Watch :

A Google promo shows up, and a conflict-of-interest theory gets a little stronger.

Google Watch :

A Google promo shows up, and a conflict-of-interest theory gets a little stronger.

Google Watch :

A Google promo shows up, and a conflict-of-interest theory gets a little stronger.

Google Watch :

A Google promo shows up, and a conflict-of-interest theory gets a little stronger.

Google Watch :

A Google promo shows up, and a conflict-of-interest theory gets a little stronger.

Post a Comment

 
 


Advertisement
Advertisement