Google SearchWiki a Genius Stroke to Keep Us in Google, Seeing Ads
TechCrunch's Michael Arrington asks the key question about why Google unleashed SearchWiki on us all: why did Google do it? He suspects Google wants to use SearchWiki, in which users edit, reorder, remove and comment on search results, to gather more data from our searches in the long run. I suspect he is right; we all believe Google is keen on harvesting data about us. But after using the service for a few hours, I have another suspicion. Consider Google's publicly stated mission with SearchWiki: "With just a single click you can move the results you like to the top or add a new site. You can also write notes attached to a particular site and remove results that you don't feel belong." Why would we want to do this? Well, ideally it will make it easier for us to find the results that best suit our needs. It is an exercise that lets us tailor the search results, but to what end? To keep us in Google more, of course, so that when we want to find info on that pizza shop in New York we stumbled upon on Google previously, we can move it to the top of the list for the "pizza in New York query" we did two weeks before to find it. Google Operating System's Alex Chitu sums it up nicely:
SearchWiki's main idea is to give users the opportunity to manually customize the search results and make them more predictable. Since many people repeat common searches like [mail], [weather], [news] and Google's results are constantly changing, it's nice to pick your favorite results and display them at the top. In essence, Google is letting us create bookmarks within Google, so that instead of going to bookmarks in our Web browsers to find Web sites and other destinations, we can just go to Google and find what we need with some consistency. SearchWiki, simply, helps us filter out the noise rampant in Google and other search engines. This will be quite self-empowering to some people, who will no doubt love the fact that they can control what they need to find on search results pages, and comment on results to help other people. That's Google's genius stroke; we believe SearchWiki is letting us control our search destiny, but Google gets to keep putting up more search ads in front of us. Google wants us to find what we're looking for, and now it has provided a way to keep us in Google.com to do so. Unless the mass majority of users feel trapped like Arrington does and rebel, SearchWiki is a great tactic by a great search strategist. Advertisers will grow to love it and keep signing up for AdWords and AdSense. Theoretically, we all win, but Google profits above all. |

Comments (7)
This just reinforces Googles commitment to evolving the web...I applaud the juggernaut!
Posted by overtext | November 21, 2008 2:32 PM
"Don't be evil" YEAH Right!
Google is starting to annoy a loooot of people. It shows one, that if data mining is an unknown factor to the common mans intelligence, then people practicing it, are bound to draw circles around people who dont have a clue, as to what information can do or what it's worth.
I can't stand google. and nor should you. Every drop of your google query is worth money. Not mine.. not mine.. you hear that larry and Sergie.. not mine.
Posted by Ashton Sollise | November 21, 2008 2:45 PM
All hail the god of search!
Posted by jlp | November 21, 2008 2:50 PM
Ashton: Goog is the best.
Posted by lubomi | November 21, 2008 3:01 PM
Wow, "Ashton Sollise" sounds like he woke up on the wrong side of the bed.
Google is awesome! It may have happened, but I don't recall any time I could not find what I was looking for.
The other thing I like about Google is all the philanthropic stuff they do for renewable energy (a favorite topic of mine). You should check out Google.org, if you're also interested.
Posted by HereAndNow | November 21, 2008 3:53 PM
Ashton's post is as biased and bigoted as this column's author. It's much in the line of the posts that we've become accustomed by Mr. Boulton, which actually reflects rather poorly on eWeek's general quality standard...
Posted by Former reader of this column | November 23, 2008 4:21 PM
This is not journalism, but silliness built on silliness. This reads a bit like somebody trying to point out that the sky is blue and then trying to make a story out of it by repeating how blue the sky is.
Eg. "Google wants us to find what we're looking for..." Huh? A search engine allowing us to find what we are looking for?! Who would have thought? Quick, the hills I tell you. We must run to them.
I'll let you in on a secret of western economies: If a company makes good products, they get to profit from them. This is the very backbone of market based economies. If the product sucks, they won't turn a profit in the long run.
It isn't something to cry yourself to sleep about, but the very economic principles that have given us all great affluence.
Posted by Stephen | November 24, 2008 4:51 PM