Salesforce.com Tried to Buy Zoho Before Google Deal
Would today's enhanced integration between Salesforce.com and Google have happened if Salesforce.com had bought Zoho? That's the multimillion-dollar question raised in my mind by AdventNet CEO Sridhar Vembu, whose company owns the Zoho unit that makes SAAS (software as a service) collaboration and business applications to rival Salesforce.com and Google. Vembu blasted Salesforce.com CEO Marc Benioff's "business model bloat" in a blog post the afternoon of April 4, claiming that Salesforce.com spends nearly eight times on sales and marketing what it does on research and development. This, Vembu said, was one of the reasons Zoho declined to let Salesforce.com acquire the unit in 2007. One has to believe that if Salesforce.com had bought Zoho, the company would be competing instead of partnering with Google. Here is the dirt, along with a spreadsheet displaying Salesforce.com's revenues, to support Vembu's point:
Vembu then claims Benioff doesn't get open ecosystems, and in the next line praises the Google Gears folks for playing nice with Zoho (offline access for Zoho Writer). In the killing stroke, he claims the Google-Salesforce.com integration won't work because the "Salesforce business model is an evolutionary dead end." Hmmm. Maybe I'm reading into this the wrong way, but Vembu sounds like a spurned man trying to denigrate one rival who it felt took it too lightly while cozying up to another rival. I also wonder where Zoho stands. Zoho's collaboration software must contend with the incredibly popular Google Apps on one front, while taking on the SAAS business app behemoth in Salesforce.com on the other. Imagine getting squeezed by that vise. I'll be looking into this more closely with Zoho and Salesforce.com for eWEEK tomorrow. |
Create, Communicate, Collaborate with IT Professionals at Ziff Davis Enterprise IT Link
Comments (2)
Clint, no we are not disappointed at being "spurned" - we were invited by Salesforce, not the other way around. It was entirely our decision not to sell the company to them, and not to take the AppExchange "deal" Benioff offered. I posted this to call into question two things: a) the viability of AppExchange as a platform and ecosystem, with their closed & expensive business model b) their claim that they didn't want to compete with Google.
If anything, Salesforce was the one spurned by us, and then chose the Google integration option. That is the history that actually happened!
As for Zoho, we are doing great guns, particularly in Zoho CRM. The competition against Salesforce, in particular, is not a difficult one. There aren't many times in business history when an efficient competitor lost to a bloated one.
Thanks for the post, by the way!
Sridhar Vembu
Posted by Sridhar Vembu | April 14, 2008 6:07 PM
This looks like a real case of "sour grapes".
Vembu from Zoho is saying that if he had sold to salesforce.com that nobody would have wanted integration with Google Apps?
That is a pretty silly idea.
The integration got built because customers asked for it.
Posted by Scott | April 15, 2008 12:44 PM